Skip to content

  • Projects
  • Groups
  • Snippets
  • Help
    • Loading...
    • Help
    • Support
    • Submit feedback
    • Contribute to GitLab
  • Sign in / Register
B
blue-shark
  • Project
    • Project
    • Details
    • Activity
    • Cycle Analytics
  • Issues 1
    • Issues 1
    • List
    • Boards
    • Labels
    • Milestones
  • Merge Requests 0
    • Merge Requests 0
  • CI / CD
    • CI / CD
    • Pipelines
    • Jobs
    • Schedules
  • Wiki
    • Wiki
  • Snippets
    • Snippets
  • Members
    • Members
  • Collapse sidebar
  • Activity
  • Create a new issue
  • Jobs
  • Issue Boards
  • Hugo Killinger
  • blue-shark
  • Issues
  • #1

Closed
Open
Opened Aug 20, 2025 by Hugo Killinger@njyhugo183815
  • Report abuse
  • New issue
Report abuse New issue

Determining Fair Market Value Part I.


Determining reasonable market value (FMV) can be an intricate process, as it is extremely based on the particular realities and scenarios surrounding each appraisal assignment. Appraisers should work out expert judgment, supported by trustworthy data and sound methodology, to figure out FMV. This often requires careful analysis of market trends, the availability and dependability of comparable sales, and an understanding of how the residential or commercial property would perform under common market conditions including a willing buyer and a prepared seller.

This post will resolve figuring out FMV for the planned use of taking an income tax reduction for a non-cash charitable contribution in the United States. With that being said, this method applies to other intended uses. While Canada's meaning of FMV varies from that in the US, there are numerous similarities that permit this general methodology to be applied to Canadian functions. Part II in this blogpost series will deal with Canadian language specifically.

Fair market price is defined in 26 CFR § 1.170A-1( c)( 2) as "the rate at which residential or commercial property would change hands in between a prepared purchaser and a willing seller, neither being under any compulsion to purchase or to offer and both having sensible knowledge of relevant facts." 26 CFR § 20.2031-1( b) expands upon this meaning with "the fair market price of a particular item of residential or commercial property ... is not to be identified by a forced sale. Nor is the reasonable market worth of a product to be identified by the price of the item in a market aside from that in which such product is most typically offered to the public, taking into consideration the area of the product anywhere proper."

The tax court in Anselmo v. Commission held that there need to be no difference in between the meaning of reasonable market price for various tax usages and therefore the combined meaning can be used in appraisals for non-cash charitable contributions.

IRS Publication 561, Determining the Value of Donated Residential Or Commercial Property, is the very best beginning point for assistance on figuring out fair market price. While federal guidelines can appear daunting, the current variation (Rev. December 2024) is only 16 pages and uses clear headings to assist you discover crucial info rapidly. These ideas are likewise covered in the 2021 Core Course Manual, beginning at the bottom of page 12-2.

Table 1, discovered at the top of page 3 on IRS Publication 561, provides an important and concise visual for figuring out reasonable market price. It lists the following considerations presented as a hierarchy, with the most reliable signs of identifying fair market value noted first. To put it simply, the table is presented in a hierarchical order of the strongest arguments.

1. Cost or asking price 2. Sales of comparable residential or commercial properties 3. Replacement expense 4. Opinions of professional appraisers

Let's check out each consideration separately:

1. Cost or Selling Price: The taxpayer's expense or the real market price gotten by a qualified company (an organization eligible to get tax-deductible charitable contributions under the Internal Revenue Code) might be the best indicator of FMV, particularly if the deal happened near the date under typical market conditions. This is most reliable when the sale was current, at arm's length, both parties knew all appropriate facts, neither was under any obsession, and market conditions remained steady. 26 CFR § 1.482-1(b)( 1) defines "arm's length" as "a deal between one celebration and an independent and unassociated celebration that is conducted as if the 2 celebrations were strangers so that no conflict of interest exists."

This lines up with USPAP Standards Rule 8-2(a)(x)( 3 ), which says the appraiser needs to supply enough info to suggest they abided by the requirements of Standard 7 by "summing up the outcomes of analyzing the subject residential or commercial property's sales and other transfers, agreements of sale, options, and listing when, in accordance with Standards Rule 7-5, it was needed for reputable task results and if such information was readily available to the appraiser in the typical course of company." Below, a comment further states: "If such details is unobtainable, a statement on the efforts carried out by the appraiser to get the information is required. If such information is unimportant, a declaration acknowledging the presence of the details and mentioning its absence of significance is required."

The appraiser should request the purchase cost, source, and date of acquisition from the donor. While donors may hesitate to share this info, it is needed in Part I of Form 8283 and likewise appears in the IRS Preferred Appraisal Format for products valued over $50,000. Whether the donor declines to supply these information, or the appraiser determines the information is not appropriate, this should be clearly documented in the appraisal report.

2. Sales of Comparable Properties: Comparable sales are one of the most trustworthy and frequently utilized techniques for determining FMV and are specifically persuasive to designated users. The strength of this approach depends upon numerous crucial aspects:

Similarity: The closer the similar is to the donated residential or commercial property, the stronger the evidence. Adjustments need to be made for any distinctions in condition, quality, or other value appropriate characteristic. Timing: Sales ought to be as close as possible to the assessment date. If you utilize older sales information, first verify that market conditions have actually remained steady and that no more current comparable sales are available. Older sales can still be used, but you should change for any changes in market conditions to reflect the present value of the subject residential or commercial property. Sale Circumstances: The sale must be at arm's length between informed, unpressured parties. Market Conditions: Sales must happen under regular market conditions and not during abnormally inflated or depressed durations.

To pick appropriate comparables, it's essential to completely understand the definition of fair market worth (FMV). FMV is the rate at which residential or commercial property would change hands between a prepared buyer and a prepared seller, with neither party under pressure to act and both having sensible knowledge of the truths. This definition refers specifically to actual completed sales, not listings or estimates. Therefore, only sold results need to be used when identifying FMV. Asking rates are merely aspirational and do not show a consummated deal.

In order to select the most typical market, the appraiser needs to consider a more comprehensive overview where equivalent used products (i.e., secondary market) are offered to the public. This usually narrows the focus to either auction sales or gallery sales-two unique marketplaces with different characteristics. It's essential not to integrate comparables from both, as doing so stops working to clearly identify the most common market for the subject residential or commercial property. Instead, you must consider both markets and then select the finest market and consist of comparables from that market.
land-rover-blog.com
3. Replacement Cost: Replacement expense can be thought about when identifying FMV, but just if there's a reasonable connection between a product's replacement cost and its fair market value. Replacement expense refers to what it would cost to change the product on the appraisal date. In a lot of cases, the replacement cost far exceeds FMV and is not a trustworthy indication of worth. This method is used rarely.

4. Opinions of professional appraisers: The IRS enables expert viewpoints to be considered when identifying FMV, but the weight provided depends upon the professional's qualifications and how well the viewpoint is supported by truths. For the opinion to carry weight, it should be backed by reputable evidence (i.e., market information). This method is utilized rarely. Determining fair market value includes more than applying a definition-it needs thoughtful analysis, sound approach, and dependable market data. By following IRS assistance and thinking about the facts and circumstances linked to the subject residential or commercial property, appraisers can produce conclusions that are well-supported. Upcoming posts in this series will further explore these ideas through real-world applications and case examples.
land-rover-fleet.com

Assignee
Assign to
None
Milestone
None
Assign milestone
Time tracking
None
Due date
None
0
Labels
None
Assign labels
  • View project labels
Reference: njyhugo183815/blue-shark#1